3 Sept – 16 Oct, 2011

Chasing Sites is a relatively sedate presentation for artist Weng Wei, focusing on her ink paintings on rectangles of paper and cutouts affixed to clearly delimited sections of the gallery walls. These new works and their installation in Pékin Fine Arts have calmed the spontaneity of her earlier appearances, and this aspect of spontaneity—instigated in part by the precarious conditions under which she was then working—she now treats with some ambivalence. This show has become a critique of those conditions, with the new works as close readings of past installations, rationalisations of the things which she looked for from those venues but which she feels were lacking.

Drawn from her memories of those situations, these paintings seem to visualise some of the physical and mental conditions under which she was working. The paintings themselves are in dense black ink on heavy paper, with crisp outlines but including the occasional representation of a brushed edge. The overall impression is very strong, although what these forms represent remains ambiguous. At times elements can be discerned. There are some recognisable architectural spaces in isometric or perspective projections – the regular forms of art-fair booths in SmileAngel Foundation, CIGE 2011 (2011); and the small gallery space of Slice at Arrow Factory Space, Beijing (2010). Also occurring are representations of the iconic shapes that have consistently appeared in her work, including those of her paper cutouts that now lose their freestanding nature to become graphic forms on paper or attached to the gallery walls. The blurring of boundaries between the forms of the cutouts and the artist’s paper weavings, a feature of past installations, here has become another of the symbols in these new works.

Previously, where these shapes, elements and events have all inhabited a narrative universe defined by the artist, that aspect is now not raised and they apparently stand-alone or simply serve as pointers back to their original settings, from where they can reconnect with that literary-symbolic function within the artist’s world-view. I hope the texts and stories are carrying on in the background as I always felt that these allegorical elements energised the work, adding a surreal depth to their meanings. In the current show it seems as if the previous settings and gallery sites have taken over as this allegorical energy, as many are no longer existent and have slipped into their own histories, thus providing suitable fictions for the artist to build upon.

An aspect that I must also recognise, and which makes my own relation to this show somewhat strange, is my own implication as part of the history of these works, having represented one of the venues that is now her raw material (Anti-mapping at CPU:798, Beijing (2011)). It will be interesting to see Pékin Fine Arts’ own contribution to this legacy. One might suggest that the wall drawings that the artist has layered throughout the gallery spaces are representing this. These additions are the only coloured drawings in the show, but rely on a limited palette of pink, grey, dark green, and turquoise. A loose grid of yellow strips mark out parts of the drawings, similar to the weavings mentioned before but on a much larger grid, becoming architectural, and the structure off which the circles, weavings and shapes then launch themselves and work against.

In Weng Wei’s work the most interesting moments for me come when the artist’s library of symbols and meanings come back into contact with the world (or a world) – as narrative, installation, performance, or—as here—a far more controlled set of renditions of the past and present. While this show appears to be a valuable taking stock for the artist, I look forward to future incursions of her vision into less organised surroundings, which while perhaps uncomfortable for the artist I believe provide her with the necessary friction against which her elements can react to and thrive upon.

Author: Edward Sanderson

• First published October, 2011 in 艺术界LEAP Magazine.

Arrow Factory, 38 Jianchang Hutong (off Guozijian Jie), Beijing, 100007 China

3 July – 20 August, 2011

He An’s new installation at the store-front space Arrow Factory, is the first in a series of shows in Beijing for the Chinese artist: Tang Contemporary and Magician Space hosting shows opening this week in the 798 Art District. The installation at Arrow Factory continues the artist’s concern with lighting systems and sees a working streetlight poking through the glass of the gallery’s frontage. Below the light a small switch invites you to turn the light on and off. Behind the glass, inside the inaccessible gallery, the streetlight is broken up into short sections to fit into the confined space and snakes across the floor before disappearing into the back wall on which a black, schematic painting of rings and linking lines has been applied.

In reality this is only a third of the installation, there being another two parts nearby which the painting seems to direct the audience to. “Some 500 meters away” a shop’s lights have also been connected to system, and in another, undisclosed location another light is to be found. All these instances of lights have their respective switches, forming some kind of symbiotic lighting system that extends the reach of each flick of the switches.

Previous pieces by He An have worked with lights as a means of playing with their potential meanings as symbolic objects. From the stolen shop signs recomposed to spell out the name of the artist’s father and a Japanese actress; to the emotive phrases partially outlined in strips of light, which somehow leave a literal blank space for meaning to be grasped between these borders which brush against the forms of the characters. Shaped light seems to have a proposal of communication for the artist, which is always delayed or reconstituted.

This new piece takes that further to suggest that in the simple act of the presence or absence of light, there is the possibility of meaning to be communicated. Maybe this represents a purer form of communication, divorced from language systems – for example the Chinese characters that have been the forms in the artist’s previous work. And unlike other works by He An, the title of this piece is not physically reproduced in the installation, but remains left behind as a puzzling, surplus meaning.

In this case it is not light so much as the change from light to dark and back that allows for communication. The elaborate set up; the switching on and off; and the deliberate distancing over the three sites prevent direct communication beyond the simplest binary mode, so communication seems to become a utopian dream of connection and what remains in the blind flashing of the light is the simple fact of being present.

When I encountered the piece’s most visible section, in the Arrow Factory’s space, there was only the promise of these other locations to begin with, and the switch gives only a vague possibility of communication between them. This left me with something of a dislocated experience, where I could only take the artist’s word that these other locations exist, and if they exist, that I have some kind of control over them. Even if they exist, the dislocation suggests the users might all be working against each other in our flipping of the switches. Our initial inability to coordinate our actions by sight means that any observable effect appears random and unpredictable. It seems less communication than flailing in the dark; all we can do is express our presence by turning the light on and off.

But there are always ways to create communication at some level; binary or Morse code would seem to fit for this set of lights. But what this lighting system makes clear to me is that all communication requires collaboration and accommodation, one side must let the other “speak” and not interrupt. So a tacit agreement between the sides must be instituted, an accommodation of each switcher as communicating beings and of the space and time they need to communicate. In this case a successful communication begins with what could be characterised as an attitude of kindness and patience.

Author: Edward Sanderson

• First published 19 July, 2011 on ArtSlant.

Beijingers are famed for their obsession with food, but with all this food so readily available in the capital it’s easy to forget the complex production and distribution chains involved. So it’s interesting that artist Rikrit Tiravanija was in Beijing at the beginning of the year with a solo show at Tang Contemporary. The preparation of food for the public has become a trademark of Tiravanija’s work and serves to play with social and institutional divisions, and had a pivotal role in the development of Relational Aesthetics in the late ‘90s. In this iteration Tiravanija set up a stall providing the Chinese breakfast of doufu nao (豆腐脑) to the public.

What might be called responses to this historical precedent have recently been seen in Beijing, an example being the communal food-making and meals organised by Elaine W. Ho as part of the HomeShop project. The most recent food-based activity organised by HomeShop took place in September as part of NO+CH Open Studio Camp for which custom designed “bags-cum-picnic-mats” and a mobile tower of Baozi were produced. The focus is not so much on the food in these cases, as the fact that they “outline other forms of social space.”

In cooperation with Japanese artist Emi Uemura, Elaine has also presented the more conceptual food-based activity Chain-letter Dinner, which took place as part of the “also Space²” curated by Reinaart Vanhoe in May at C-Space Gallery. Chain-Letter Dinner used crowd-sourced recipes to create impromptu meals in the Gallery’s kitchen by and for whoever happened to be present.

Mobile Container Garden at the shop

For Emi, her observation that “…in front of food people are very open and have discussions,” has served as a fertile ground for her work. Bento Delivery (in collaboration with Vitamin Creative Space), delivered home-made Bento boxes to office workers in the CBD to draw attention to the food delivery systems that normally go unremarked when we pop out of the office at lunchtime to grab a bite to eat.

When Vitamin’s the shop relocated to a rather stark Ai Weiwei-designed building in Beijing’s Caochangdi, Emi created the Mobile Container Garden which performs the process of growing vegetables in wheeled styrofoam boxes, allowing this splintered garden to temporarily occupy parts of the site. From this work (literally) grew the Calendar Restaurant, “a restaurant that only opens when the products grow in Mobile Garden.”

Announcement for Emi Uemura’s Country Fair

And on the 27 November at Studio-X, Emi is organising the second of her Country Fairs bringing together artists, farmers and community activists to sell produce and discuss the issues around their work. For Emi “this Fair is for people to share opinions about local organic produce and discover ways to support local farmers.”

Bake Shop at Arrow Factory.

Organised by Arrow Factory, “Bake Shop” has been taking place every weekend for the last month at their hutong storefront space. The tiny space is usually only viewable from the street, but for this event it was thrown open to the public with “artisan home baking enthusiasts purvey[ing] their handmade cakes, pies, cookies, cupcakes, breads and coffee.”

Bake Shop: Arrow Factory founder and artist Wang Wei makes fresh coffee provided by artist Michael Yuen.

One of the founders of the Arrow Factory, Rania Ho suggests “…this is an experiment, in part to see what happens when a space which is completely non-commercial appears to become a shop. Our space has always been a reaction and commentary on the environment, the people who live in the area and who inform what we see and buy there.”

In their various ways, all these projects serve to create what Emi Uemura calls a “platform … to explore the relations of individuals, different social groups and networks with the intention of mixing them together.” And as Elaine W. Ho says, in many cases they “…are not artworks at all, but simply being aesthetically interested to understand/instigate naturally engaged exchanges, or ways of coming together and being together.”

Country Fair (Emi Uemura): 27 Nov, Saturday at Studio-X
Market starts: 10:00–16:00
Round-table talk and map-making : 13:00–15:00
Address: A103, 46 Fangjia Hutong, Andingmen Inner Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100007 China
Contact: +86 10 6402 8682
Website: http://www.arch.columbia.edu/studiox/events

HomeShop
Address: Xiaojingchang Hutong 6, off Guloudong Dajie, Beijing, 100009 China
Website: http://www.homeshopbeijing.org/

Arrow Factory (Rania Ho, Pauline Yao, Wang Wei)
Address: 38 Jianchang Hutong, off Guozijian Jie, Beijing, 100007 China
Website: http://www.arrowfactory.org.cn/

Author: Edward Sanderson

• First published 22 November, 2010 on ArtSlant.
• Photographs courtesy of the artists

There’s been Emi Uemura’s Country Fair and HomeShop taking culinary care of the No+ch visitors (and—kind of unrelated—but what is it with the sudden cup cake obsession in Beijing?).

I’ve just heard that we now have Arrow Factory organizing a bake sale out of their hutong storefront space, where “artisan home baking enthusiasts purvey their handmade cakes, pies, cookies, cupcakes, breads and coffee.” This will take place every weekend from Oct 30 to Nov 21, from 1-6pm on Jianchang Hutong (off Guozijian Jie).

Considering the most memorable thing about most openings is the quality of the food and wine, I can do nothing but applaud this effort. Also, keep an eye out for Michael Yuen serving fresh coffee from his mobile la pavoni machine – now that’s good crema!

UPDATE: photos

These brief notes on some “alternatives” in Beijing (and beyond) were inspired by a visit to one of the groups mentioned, TCA, which led me to question just what it meant to be “alternative,” what is “alternative” a reaction against and how do these organisations go about positioning themselves?

UPDATE: I’ve been alerted to a couple of other “alternatives” – Homeshop, and the golden tent. But I don’t know enough about them yet – working on that. Keep them coming!

Right from the outset using the word “alternative” leaves one open to all sorts of questions. “Alternative” is such a relative term that, to be understood and be useful, demands a pretty close analysis of the context within which it is used.

A characteristic of the art scene in China is the hyper-commercialised gallery-based system. The growth of the Chinese art market over the last twenty years, based around the hot-house development and promotion of the a generation of Chinese artists, has led to an unrealistic model for today’s Chinese artists – the changing economic environment over the past three years has revealed the unsustainable nature of this system. The most visible generator of this growth has undoubtedly been at the gallery level which has acted as the front line in the development of a particular group of artists. Obviously this is their job, and they have their place in the system and shouldn’t be criticised for being good at what they do, but this ability has almost been too successful, when coupled with an almost uncritical acceptance of the goods on the part of the buyers that led to a “bubble” in the market. The effect of the bubble and its collapse have not only affected the market, but also the reputations of those involved, and the reputation of particular formats of art which became indicative of the bubble.

So what does “alternative” mean in this context? These alternatives position themselves as trying to do things differently, but how that manifests itself in reality depends on whom you are talking to. For some “alternative” is positioned as against a discredited form of gallery system. A focus on the pursuit of sales is seen as symptomatic of something which has encouraged bad habits in the past. Another “alternative” is in being independent from funding partners which might be seen to direct the focus of the organisation unnecessarily. For each group their bug-bear is seen to have an adverse affect on production or programming in terms of inertia or control over the content: to position oneself as “alternative” makes an implicit or explicit assumption that in some way the “originals” restrict or subvert production.

Looking specifically at the consequences for Beijing, critic and curator Pauline Yao presents the situation thus:

At present, contemporary art has been largely defined by its commercial nature and increasing confinement to purpose-built art districts in the remote outskirts of the city. This raises many questions regarding art’s physical remove from the urban fabric of the city, not to mention the severing of an artwork’s ties to the very social and political conditions it is alleged to represent.

So, how do these “alternatives” present themselves in their specific realities? The following is a summary of the various published materials for a set of organisations that present themselves as “alternative” in some way, or could be seen as such. At the end of this piece, I’ve added a set of appendices which copy out the relevant passages from which this information comes from. This list is by no means complete, and simply reflects my own knowledge and experience. Additions and corrections are more than welcome.

Arrow Factory (Beijing)

• Personnel: Pauline Yao (curator, writer), Rania Ho (artist), Wang Wei (artist)
• http://www.arrowfactory.org.cn/
• Non-commercial (small-scale sales take place as part of a show)
• Non-product
• Consistent location
• Small physical size
• No fixed calendar
• Longer-term shows (more than one month) (including flexibility about closing dates)
• Support
  • Self-funded, donations, some small sales
  • Dedicated page on website listing supporters (includes logos and links where available)
• Comments:
  • Freedom from pressures of time and sales
  • Allows for longer projects
  • No public entry to the space, but uses the street in front as gathering space (enforces integration with the local area)

Vitamin Creative Space (Guangzhou)

• Personnel: Zhang Wei, Hu Fang, etc.
• http://www.vitamincreativespace.com/
• Commercial
• Consistent location
• No consistent programme
• Brand building for artists
  • Cao Fei/RMB City
  • Xu Tan/Keywords
• Support
  • No information about external support on website
• Comments:
  • Opposes “institutional funding” with commercial approach
  • Acting as “an ‘independent’ art space and as a ‘commercial’ gallery”

The Shop (Vitamin Creative Space) (Beijing)

• Personnel: (as with Vitamin Creative Space)
• http://vitamincreativespace.blogbus.com/
• Commercial
• Products:
  • Unique works, but also multiples, publications
• Consistent location
  • Commercial premises in shopping and business district (albeit a relatively quiet corner of one)
• No consistent programme
• Extras:
  • Talks, events
  • Insertions into galleries/art fairs (Frieze (London), CIGE (Beijing))
• Support
  • No information about outside support on website
• Comments:
  • Takes on aspects of a shop, less of a gallery
  • Events more flexible and experimental
  • Image of being less precious (more affordable?)

Chart Contemporary (various sites)

• Personnel: KC & Megan Connolly, etc.
• http://www.chartcontemporary.com/
• Commercial
• Consultancy
• Open House: Commissions
• Education activities, organised tours
• No consistent programme
• Support
  • List of clients on website, emotional investment in the project encouraged by naming them “ChARTers”
• Comments:
  • Business-like image
  • Website includes a press room, press kit, etc.
  • Professional: “Reliable and reputable, we provide our clients with the highest level of customer service and expertise.”

This City Art (TCA) (Beijing)

• Personnel: Martin Barnes (artist), Oak Taylor-Smith (artist)
• http://www.thiscityart.org/
• Artist-run organisation
• Commercial (focused on wall-mounted prints/design/photography)
• Public space, underpass, potentially anywhere
• Ultra-short term (one night only)
• No consistent programme
• Support
  • No information about outside support on website
• Comments:
  • Reproducing aspects of the gallery, outside of a gallery
  • Organised self-promotion/marketing techniques
  • Testing existing structures in new locations

INH-SZ 传承：深圳 (Shenzhen)

• Personnel: Claire Louise Staunton (director, curator), etc.
• http://inheritanceprojects.org/inh-sz/
• Curatorial project
• Non-profit, non-commercial organisation
• Short-term location
• No consistent programme
• Support
  • Provides a list of supporters on website
• Extras:
• “Exhibition, performance, music and film programme, commission new artworks, foster collaborations between local and international artists and build a publicly accessible contextual library…”

Artist Projects

Artist projects sit in a different relationship with art making than do the organisations above. The following example straddles the division between the organisation and the artwork. It plays with the same concerns as the organisations above, but intends to push the meanings and boundaries of the concepts much further, given its position of relative autonomy from the systems they are addressing. A gallery is restricted in its activities in that it must maintain its reputation as a valuable part of its currency in the art world. Artists are in a position to critique without suffering many of the consequences to their reputation that a gallery lives or dies by. Money considerations are still present though, but the artist sits in a different relation to the generation of funds than the gallery and, if they are inclined to critique the gallery by playing out its role, are given more leeway to fail in that respect. The artist has a different set of priorities which change the rules that they wish to abide by.

Donkey Institute of Contemporary Art (DICA) (various sites)

• Personnel: Michael Yuen (artist), Yam Lau (artist)
• http://www.donkeyinstitute.net/
• Curator/artist project
• Non-commercial
• Non-product
  • Video, but potential for other things
  • Screening curated collections of video
• No consistent programme
• Moveable structure
• Screen sized (+ donkey and cart)
• Event based
• Support
  • Provides a list of supporters on website
• Comments:
  • The structure is a performance in itself
  • Various levels of curation (on-screen, on donkey)

Presentation and sponsors

Marketing and branding are important indicators of an organisations’ intentions – their presentation as more or less monolithic institutions and the level of professionalism they project to the world is a factor of their attention to these tools. Funding and support, the life-blood of any organisation, are also issues that they address in various ways and situate themselves in different positions in relation to.

Chart Contemporary promote their organisation in a consistent fashion, creating a strong brand as well as clearly positioning their sponsors as part of the project. Arrow Factory have less of an over-arching branding system in place, indeed their branding is somewhat subtle. They also include a page of supporters on their website, ranging from individuals to organisations. Vitamin, deliberately position themselves as reliant on sales rather than “institutionalized” funding: “In order to operate independently from institutionalized funding, [Vitamin] is active both as an ‘independent’ art space and as a ‘commercial’ gallery.” Arrow Factory, on the other hand, distance themselves from commercial considerations: “…we do not sell anything. We subsist on small contributions from friends, colleagues and ourselves.”

“Alternative”?

So the use of the term “alternative” is not necessarily anti- the commercialisation of the artworld. From the above examples it has a lot to do with providing more possibilities for art. The major objection to galleries seems to be that they are inflexible, unable to deal with certain types of work, and tend to force artwork into certain channels and forms.

The examples I’ve mentioned play a vital role in developing the art systems. The production of these “alternatives” addresses perceived problems or deficiencies in the system. Their existence is an important aspect in the critique of art and the critique of its dissemination. Experiments and new forms of presentation are important to provide depth and perspective to the art world and to take it away from an over-reliance on a single way of dealing with art and a single type of location in which to experience it. A healthy art ecosystem supports multiples avenues of experience. These multiple avenues provide the checks and balances that prevent one section of the system from presenting a distorted vision of art and its value.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Arrow Factory

Arrow Factory is an independently run alternative art space in Beijing that is located in a small hutong alley in the city center. Arrow Factory reclaims an existing storefront and transforms it into a space for site-specific installations and projects that are designed to be viewed from the street 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Arrow Factory’s modestly sized space (15 sqm) occupies a former vegetable stand, signaling an economy of means that informs our practice and promotes artistic collaboration, exploration and experimentation across different cultural contexts and viewing publics. We are committed to presenting works by local and international artists that are provisional in nature, highly contingent upon the immediate environment and that form meaningful responses to the diverse economic, political and social conditions of our given locality and everyday lived experiences.

Arrow Factory, founded in 2008, was initiated as a response to the current conditions facing contemporary art production in Beijing. At present, contemporary art has been largely defined by its commercial nature and increasing confinement to purpose-built art districts in the remote outskirts of the city. This raises many questions regarding art’s physical remove from the urban fabric of the city, not to mention the severing of an artwork’s ties to the very social and political conditions it is alleged to represent. For Arrow Factory meaning making is an activity that occurs through interacting with the pre-existing givens of a site, and adopting a strategy whereby the social frame does not so much ‘surround’ as much as it becomes part of the work.

Arrow Factory shares the same name as the hutong alley in which we reside. We hold a temporary commercial business license, but we do not sell anything. We subsist on small contributions from friends, colleagues and ourselves. We do not hold openings and we operate modestly, spontaneously and flexibly. Our mission is simply to provide an alternative; a different context in which artists can experiment with pushing the relationships that radiate outwards from the levels of the individual, the neighborhood, the urban, the region, to finally, the global.

Supporters

• 现金赞助 Cash Donations
  • 匿名友人 Anonymous Donor
  • ArtHub
  • Peikwen Cheng & Shanti Christensen
  • 北京北青文化传播有限公司 Beiqing Culture and Communication Co., Ltd.
  • Joan Lebold Cohen
  • 贺潇 Fiona He
  • 徐峥 贾伟 夫妇 Mr and Mrs Xu Zheng and Jia Wei
• 物品捐赠 In-kind Donations
  • 李松松 Li Songsong
  • Paper Restaurant
  • Roy Kesey
  • Magnus Lindblom
  • Frank Yu
  • Michele Matteini

  Appendix 2a: Vitamin Creative Space

  Vitamin Creative Space is exploring an alternative working mode, specifically geared to the contemporary Chinese context. In order to operate independently from institutionalized funding, it is active both as an ‘independent’ art space and as a ‘commercial’ gallery. Vitamin Creative Space is actively challenging the preconception by merging these two, which traditionally are opposed strategies for supporting and presenting contemporary art, raising the searching of new Chinese contributions both from artistic practice level and institutional level within the new global context.

  Appendix 2b: The Shop (Vitamin Creative Space)

  the shop is a public space produced by Vitamin Creative Space that takes a more organic view of art practices, surrounded as they are by daily processes. As a space of daily experimentation and time accumulation, the shop will eventually not only contextualize but also produce reality.

  Appendix 3: chART Contemporary

  chART Contemporary is a Beijing based curatorial lab dedicated to Bringing together art & people. Our overarching goal is to establish cultural bridges between the East and the West through programs and activities that promote contemporary art and culture. We actively maintain an extensive network of artists, architects, designers, collectors, galleries, museums and academics. We are cultural producers fulfilling a global need by creating an open platform for artistic expression through research, education and curatorial integrity.

  Redefining The Black & White Box Model

  Open House embodies chART Contemporary’s mission of bringing together art and people through curatorial initiatives that educate, stimulate and support the production of new work by emerging artists. Open House is inspired by marketing tools used by local real estate developers to sell property based on showrooms that are designed to reflect the living standards desired in China today. Open House evolved from the American marketing concept where doors are opened to the public for an afternoon and potential buyers, renters and lookers are invited to visit a property. While the concept has different characteristics in each country, Open House has a commonality where anything is possible and the world is yours for the taking.

  The Open House series presents a site-specific project for one afternoon in a space that is for rent, sale, abandoned or slated for demolition. The Open House series gives people an opportunity to interact with contemporary art beyond the black and white walls in a gallery or museum. There is no equivalent of the American concept Open House in Chinese, but the term yangbanjian, which means showroom, conveys a similar feeling where real estate is on display for public consumption.

  Supporters

  • Aspen Art Museum
  • Cincinnati Art Museum
  • Citigroup
  • Cleveland Museum of Art
  • Columbia University
  • Condé Nast – Traveler Magazine Gertrude Contemporary Art Space
  • Gertrude Contemporary Art Space
  • Hong Kong Art Museum
  • MIT
  • NYU
  • Saint Ann’s School
  • Seattle Art Museum
  • Sotheby’s
  • The Clark Art Institute
  • The Metropolitan Museum Of Art
  • The New Museum
  • The New York Times
  • World Monuments Fund

  Appendix 4: This City Art

  公共PUBLIC’s intention is to integrate everyday urban environments directly with their work through a desire to be resourceful and independent in the current climate, yet still achieve and evolve as visual artists.

  Alternative art capturing the spirit of cities, created and exhibited for unique events in unusual spaces.

  TCA make art influenced from direct experiences of cities. Two foreign artist living and working in Beijing, seeing the city in unique alternative ways that come from being a visitor.

  To make genuine events which promote their Art, and media friendly stories to bring awareness to their creative process.

  To participate in art based events and projects which engage subjects, locations and people in New Ways.

  Appendix 5: INH-SZ 传承：深圳 (Inheritance-Shenzhen)

  Proposed as a temporary and potentially mobile project space, the mission of INH-SZ 传承：深圳 is to demand urgent questions about the art history and visual culture of the new and migrant city. Accessing such issues as history making, voluntary displacement and exile, economic migrancy, identity and gender politics through artistic and curatorial practices – Inheritance Projects hopes that this is only one element of a permanent engagement with the impermanent city.

  INH-SZ 传承：深圳 has an open door policy with an unobtrusive but active public programmes, inviting the local population to see in a local context, the artistic practices of artists who live and work in the city. There will be workshops with Shenzhen schools and universities, research and development of local artists and unstructured happenings involving the nearby residents and merchants. It is fundamental to INH-HZ 传承：深圳 that the habitants of Bai Shi Zhou and wider Shenzhen have the opportunity to experience art without feeling patronized or excluded in order to recognize the artistic heritage of the young city.

  Supporters

  • Connections through Culture (British Council)
  • British Council
  • 2009 Shenzhen & Hong Kong Bi-city Biennale of Urbanism\Architecture
  • Vision Forum

  Appendix 6: The Donkey Institute of Contemporary Art (DICA)

  The Donkey Institute of Contemporary Art (DICA) is an initiative dedicated to supporting experimental contemporary art on the back of a donkey. Established in the Beijing summer of 2009, DICA demonstrates a donkey’s spirit of steadfast oblivion. The DICA and the donkey counter all forms of calculated intelligence, promotion and profit-making within the market place of contemporary art. They do so with the slowest possible speed, the most idle tactics and wandering work ethics.

  Obstinate, dumb and proceeding on blind faith, DICA meanders throughout cities to meet its potential audience, whoever that might be. Yet, DICA makes no claim or appeal for recognition in these encounters. The institute lives by the charm and rhythm that is unique to the donkey’s soul. In this sense, DICA is the most inhuman and radical fulfillment of the avant-garde. It posits an almost complete sort of “standing-still” that refuses to concede to anything. For its inaugural meandering exhibition, DICA will present video works on portable monitors attached on the back of the Donkey.

  Supporters

  • CPU:PRO
  • Yuanfen New Media Art Space
  • REJON
  • Kate Lu
  • Bao Xiao
  • Laoban Soundsystem
  • Our donkey
  ]]> http://blog.escdotdot.com/2010/04/28/notes-on-alternatives-in-china/feed/ 1 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://blog.escdotdot.com/2008/11/20/alternative-bj-project-work/ http://blog.escdotdot.com/2008/11/20/alternative-bj-project-work/#comments Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:30:48 +0000 escdotdot http://blog.escdotdot.com/?p=429 Continue reading →]]> I think in general it’s an interesting question: what is alternative? It’s obviously completely relative to the established situation. I think the way things are at the moment in Beijing, that means working around the profound commercialisation of the majority of presentations that are currently taking place.

  So, if I was asked to point someone in the direction of ‘alternative’ spaces in Beijing, where would I send them?

  My first thought would be the Arrow Factory, a project space located in an old hutong shop front. And why do I think of this as alternative? Because it’s one of the few spaces which leaves behind the established art zones (798, Dashanzi, the Liquor Factory), and is also determinedly non-commercial.

  I think project work in general and specifically the kind of things Arrow Factory are presenting, are some of the most interesting thing happening in the visual arts in Beijing at the moment. By ‘project’ I mean to go beyond producing just a set of products which fit nicely into the ultra-commercialised environment we have here at the moment. The gallery I look after also concentrates on projects, with an internal definition of working with the artists to make the most of their ideas, supporting them however we can, allowing them to develop their ideas in new presentations that may be within or outside the space itself. Other spaces like Long March, Arario and Joy Art (wow, they don’t have a website) also have this kind of vision, I think.

  Another interesting space, although technically from Guangzhou, is Vitamin Creative Space. They are currently showing their ‘SHOP’ project here in Beijing after its debut at London’s Frieze Art Fair. Now this piece seems to throw the commercialism back in your face – it is a shop after all, positively revelling in the commercial status of the works on display, but by doing so you feel that there is an implicit critique going on of that structure from which the ‘SHOP’ gains it’s everyday meaning and rôle.

  But I don’t think I’m being naïve or overly idealistic, even given the situation we are in at the moment. We all have to make money somehow, not least the artists, so I’m not talking about rejecting saleability altogether (unless that is your particular schtick). I’m just trying to make a case for seeing other meanings for artworks than an immediate call to their capital value, which in my experience has tended to lead to lack of innovation and staleness in recent Chinese contemporary art, as it has done elsewhere in the world at different moments.

  With project work you have a kind of commitment to the artwork which seems to be one way to define ‘alternative’ at this moment in Beijing, as it’s not that common yet, or perhaps it’s just that good results are rare to find.

  As an afternote, it will be interesting to see how things develop with the global financial downturn, and what this means for ‘alternatives’.

  ]]> http://blog.escdotdot.com/2008/11/20/alternative-bj-project-work/feed/ 0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/